Internet application development allows you to implement many effective business ideas and approaches. Comfort means different things to different people. Someone is comfortable with what they are used to. Someone needs an automatic class check, and for the third, speed is the most important. While any setting can be important for programmers, for customers the goal is the same: it is an efficient and smooth application. Let’s compare two popular development languages and platforms.
. Net benefits
Benefits of. REPORT overlap with Java in some aspects. Here are some metrics that are roughly equal. The preferences of the different developers are purely individual:
- The integration. With Sharpe everything is simple – Visual Studio installed and no problem, there is both the included .NET Framework and the SDK. For Java, you have to install the execution environment, called on the Oracle site simply “Java”, then the JDK, then the IDE, and Oracle does not offer it, you have to look elsewhere, and also make sure that the versions are much the same in all three products. The second approach is a bit more complicated. But, in general, this only slows down the process at the very beginning and insignificantly.
- Multiplatform is an attribute of both languages. It was a Java privilege. But with the advent of .NET Core, this platform also works on different operating systems.
- Speed. There is also no single answer at this point. The question is: what is most important to you – writing code fast and testing it slowly, or vice versa? In Java, the writing process takes longer, but testing and debugging will take less time. The choice depends on the criteria for leaving the project.
Compared to the .NET platform, Java still has drawbacks:
- Java requires infinitely more memory consumption due to the fact that it has no collections of primitive types. For example, a 100 million byte list in C # is about 100 million bytes and will take (plus additional information – several tens of bytes), and in Java – 2.1 billion bytes ( since an object wrapper must be created on each byte).
- The absence of unsigned integer types in Java.
- Lack of compilation constants, which are replaced by their own text at runtime. There is a mix of static and final modifiers that have the same effect as a constant, but these constants are not expanded at compile time.
- Lack of properties and especially indexers. This might not be a serious inconvenience, but for some, especially young programmers, it does interfere. Use instead of list [i] = 100; list.set of heavy and unobvious construction (i, 100); or even worse – list.setElementAt (100, i); fun is not the best.
- Lack of output parameters for functions.
- No decimal type. This means that not all financial affairs in Java can be solved. (There is java.math.BigDecimal, but it’s not the same).
- The impossibility of an enumerated type variable with the value of a set of constants. It is possible to do a set of counts, but how many resources will it take?
- No operator overload.
- Lack of multidimensional arrays.
From the point of view of speed, convenience and quality of development, these bonuses are quite significant:
- Most of the external builds in Java are open source.
- It is possible to exit nested loops without using a bad goto statement.
- Many people point out that decompiling is much more difficult.
- Checked exceptions slow down the process a bit, but avoid human factor inaccuracies.
If you are interested in developing in this language or have any questions, please feel free to ask them at https://www.dataxdev.com/services/java/. An experienced specialist will advise you on the best way to implement your concept so that the application works for business development.