Iranian queen’s gambit meets Sicilian defense of Israel

With its economy on the brink of collapse, the survival of the Islamic regime in Tehran may depend on a new deal with the United States and the West. Iran’s proxy war, using Hamas and Hezbollah, against Israel is a critical tool in pressuring the West to comply with the demands of the Islamic Republic. These include a complete opening of their economy to world markets and acceptance of their nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Using a live chess theory approach that studies chess strategies, openings, and historical games between grandmasters, we can identify Iran’s strategic moves in real time and examine what its goals and objectives are. ‘he is a rational actor. Ultimately, the most important question is: Will Tehran use nuclear weapons? Unlike artificial intelligence (AI), which is an analytical process, failures are a systemic process. AI is based on mimicking human cognitive abilities using supercomputers, extrapolating endless scenario options. Chess relies on unique human choices for each movement that may or may not involve intuition and self-awareness.A recent article stated that the Israeli-Palestinian crisis of 2021 was the first war on high performance computing and AI. . Israeli systems have used AI to make high-value target recommendations for military intelligence. Another system mapped the terrain in Gaza and was able to identify changes in real time that would indicate live launch sites. Yet another used information from the ground to alert Israeli troops to possible impending attacks. General Yosef Kuperwasser, former head of the IDF Military Intelligence Directorate’s Research Division, in a groundbreaking article published by the Brookings Institution, supported the use of systems thinking (including analysis of chess is one example) as a military intelligence analysis tool. “Systems thinking,” Kuperwasser wrote, “has enabled analysts to offer more comprehensive intelligence estimates and to produce a holistic intelligence product by better understanding how arenas develop and putting more emphasis on it. ’emphasis on the cultural environment of a subject (ideology, religion, public opinion, psychology, literature and the arts). “Chess is about controlling the center, gaining a spatial advantage, and protecting the king – all concepts that can be applied to the Israeli-Iranian conflict. Nothing in chess is random; all the pieces have one. only objective: to serve the king (the regime). As the game progresses, coins are sacrificed for the greater good. Unless the players agree to a draw, a tie, the game. game is over when the attacker declares to the opponent “checkmate”, from the carpet of the Persian shah: the king is dead. analyze the geopolitical movements of the Islamic Republic through the prism of openings and strategies of All of them spoke freely on condition of anonymity for the safety of their families who still reside in Iran.

In the geopolitical chess game between Iran and Israel, Iran is playing blank and is in violation. In chess parlance, Iran is playing a queen’s game. A gambit is a chess opening that hangs a piece, challenging you to take it. The Queen’s Gambit allows the opponent to allocate significant resources on top of each other, limiting their movements. It is not unlike the Battle of Thermopylae, where the Spartans were trapped in a mountain pass. The Iranians will continue to sacrifice Hamas, as well as Hezbollah, when it suits them to achieve a strategic imbalance. Loyalty, after all, is to the king; it is not asked of the king. When the Queen’s Gambit is played, even the Queen herself can be sacrificed. According to a former family member of the Iranian ruling elite who served under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and then briefly under Islamic rule, the Islamic regime did just that by “sacrificing” General Qasem Soleimani, Major General of the Force. Quds of the IRGC. Articles in Time and the Atlantic Council both stress the lack of substantial Iranian retaliation for his “martyrdom” and the potential benefits of Soleimani’s death for the regime – providing a rallying point for the people and eliminating a potential internal threat to the regime. clerics who wish to control the transfer of power upon the death of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Israel is playing black, on defense, and has declined the bet of Iran. The Jewish state is playing a transposed version of Sicilian defense, the main objective of which is to put pressure on the white center. He does this by sacrificing a position on the periphery while attacking and maintaining critical space in the center. Israel, knowing that Iran has a space advantage that cannot be overcome, plays the Sicilian to counter and execute attacks deep into enemy territory. This is a strategic subterfuge in seeking to place an attack piece deep into enemy territory where it can cause chaos. Black’s goal with the Sicilian defense is to bring unbalanced and asymmetrical positions on the board and maintain that imbalance.Chess is to control space, attack weak squares, and take control of other squares. open. Iran can produce insane complications, create plenty of tactical possibilities to surprise Israel, and enter into a long and drawn-out endgame if Israel doesn’t finish the job in the middle of the game. If Israel had entrenched itself in the fighting in Gaza, Iran’s next move would have been for Hezbollah to fire its missiles at Israel, opening up a third front and wreaking havoc. Chess purists who read this will revolt. Iran and Israel are playing side games. In an actual game of chess, the Sicilian defense cannot be played against the Queen’s Gambit. Geopolitics is not limited by the 64 squares and the clock of a standard chess game. During the Cold War, chess theory demonstrated that the former Soviet Union was extremely unlikely to launch nuclear weapons. In Russian (Soviet) chess, the toss is a valuable strategic tool. The same chess theory tells us a rather different story about the Islamic Republic of Tehran which will sacrifice anything and anyone to stay in power. In chess, a spatial advantage allows a player to take strategic risks; this makes the consequences of the opponent’s counter affordable. US professor of constitutional and criminal law Alan Dershowitz frequently recounts an anecdote about late Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani that illustrates a classic implementation of the centrality of space in chess theory. Rafsanjani, considered relatively moderate, once told an American journalist that if Iran launched a strategic nuclear strike against Israel it would “kill up to 5 million Jews,” and that if Israel retaliated, it would kill 15 million. Iranians. This, Rafsanjani says in Dershowitz’s account, would be “a small sacrifice among the billion Muslims in the world. … It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality. “Zaq Harrison is an entrepreneur with over 30 years of experience in the private and not-for-profit sectors. Harrison writes on topics ranging from global real estate analysis to pre-IPO valuation of ridesharing companies to the root causes of the 2008 global financial crises to the societal responsibilities of the free market in the 21st century.


Source link

About Mariel Baker

Check Also

The LLNL team uses the Ruby supercomputer to study the effects of nuclear weapons on detonations near the surface

June 8, 2021 – A team from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) took a closer …